Today’s (8/9/09) Oregonian editorial “Oregon’s a slow
starter in race to better schools” nails it in its summary of the educational environment
in Oregon (here):
But what's going on with education here is not in the best Oregon tradition. This is a state that's been a bold, creative national trendsetter on everything from land-use planning to juvenile justice to protection of public beaches. And yet here we are, chugging along on schools, continually bickering over money and control, fighting most changes, and imagining all the while that we're actually in a race to the top.
We have serious problems with pockets of underachieving
students and students not completing high school. There are contentious issues
about how to solve those issues. But Oregon should not let those issues suck
all the air out of the room. We have other dimensions we need to address.
We could and should, of course, invigorate our foreign
language programs and create a Go Global High School Study Abroad Program. The additional
costs would be minimal and the changes incremental. Oregon could become a
national leader with our K-12 international education programs, but only if Oregon
wants to get out of the education slow lane.
Oregon is falling behind in applying the digital revolution to education. Not only did the legislature pass HB 767 slowing the growth of online charter schools, but Oregon is not really developing online courses as a part of the mainline public school system. Florida has its Florida Virtual School (here, wiki here) serving 63,675 students with 137,475 half-credit enrollments in 2007-08 with a staff of 1104. Oregon has next to nothing with its Oregon Virtual School District (here).
Meanwhile, the digital revolution moves on. The NY Times has
a front page story “In a Digital Future, Textbooks May Become History” by Tamar
Lewin. It reports (here):
“We’re still in a brick-and-mortar, 30-students-to-1-teacher paradigm,” Mr.
Habermehl said, “but we need to get out of that framework to having 200 or 300
kids taking courses online, at night, 24/7, whenever they want.”
“I don’t believe that charters and vouchers are the threat to schools in
Orange County,” he said. “What’s a threat is the digital world — that someone’s
going to put together brilliant $200 courses in French, in geometry by the best
teachers in the world.”
For all the attention to the California initiative, digital textbooks are
only the start of the revolution in educational technology.
“We should be bracing ourselves for way more interactive, way more engaging
videos, activities and games,” said Marina Leight of the Center for Digital
Education, which promotes digital education through surveys, publications and
meetings.
“I don’t believe that charters and vouchers are the threat to schools in Orange County,” he said. “What’s a threat is the digital world — that someone’s going to put together brilliant $200 courses in French, in geometry by the best teachers in the world.”
Posted by: Pandora Bracelets | May 03, 2011 at 06:43 PM
Oregon is falling behind in applying the digital revolution to education. Not only did the legislature pass HB 767 slowing the growth of online charter schools, but Oregon is not real
Posted by: pandora | May 03, 2011 at 06:44 PM
le, the digital revolution moves on. The NY Times has a front page story “In a Digital Future, Textbooks May Become
Posted by: christian louboutin sale | May 03, 2011 at 06:45 PM
I don’t believe that charters and vouchers are the threat to schools in Orange County,” he said. “What’s a threat is the digital world — that someone’s going to put together brilliant $200 courses in French, in geometry by the best teachers in the world.
Posted by: louboutin | May 03, 2011 at 06:46 PM
“We’re still in a brick-and-mortar, 30-students-to-1-teacher paradigm,” Mr. Habermehl said, “but we need to get out of that framework to having 200 or 300 kids taking courses online, at night, 24/7, whenever they want.”
Posted by: Pandora Charms | May 03, 2011 at 06:47 PM